there are so many good things about San Francisco.
sadly, coffee is not one of them.
honestly, i don't understand why it is so damn hard to get a decent shot of espresso in San Francisco! think about it... a culture of taste and experience, a great demographic, dense population, a history of coffee appreciation, a food culture, good environmental factors and one of the main coffee import ports right across the Bay. and yet the coffee just sucks.
there is one near exception... in the Ferry Building there is a cafe/bakery run by Frog Hollow Fruit (growers of the famous Frog Hollow Peaches). it's hidden back in a corner of the building. and someone there is trying.
their staff is trained (to a certain degree). they seem interested in producing decent coffee. they don't do blended drinks, don't brew big pots of drip. they're using Blue Bottle coffees and running an FB70.
i've had probably a half-dozen to a dozen espresso drinks from them so far. the espresso seems to be a purely latin blend, perhaps with a very very clean Indonesian as accent. it's a clean cup, but a bit light in the body and a bit flat in profile. the flatness may well be due to the prep, not the bean. i think they're running their machine a bit too cold. none the less, it's far and away the best espresso in the city. on the other hand... their milk ranges from barely acceptable to generic US coffee bar crap. most of the time, if you order a cappuccino, they'll do that awful egg white froth on top. and, oddly, they only have the small ceramic cups, so if you want a cappuccino or a latte it's in paper (and they don't pre-heat the cups).
still, when it comes right down to it, this is the only option if you want a decent espresso. and, perhaps with time, they may well get it more dialed.
while in SF i ran into Duane from Stumptown. it's a small world indeed! by pure chance, we were both at Toronado tasting beers one afternoon.
it was both a pleasure and an honor to spend some time talking with him. really incredibly energizing and motivating.
it's so cool to run into someone who is as passionate and knowledgable about coffee as he is. and to think that he's a coffee business owner... it made me realize not only just how lucky the employees at Stumptown are - but also how critical such attributes are in an owner. i started thinking about the really good coffee businesses - the ones i really admire. and i realized that every single one of them, without exception, is owned by someone who has that passion, that committment - and that knowledge. i think it's possible to do a great coffee business without such an owner, but it is incredibly difficult. i think it's also possible to have a bad coffee business with such an owner. but the simple fact remains that the best way to develop a great coffee business is to start with an owner like Duane.
i'm envious of the baristi there.
and i learned a huge amount in that brief period of time. to a large degree, what i learned was about how little i know. but, for me, that sort of experience is motivational. i want to get there - i want to gain that sort of expertise.
it was all very cool.
8.23.2004
8.18.2004
8.13.2004
A “Varietal” Espresso Revolution
The Case for Single Origin Shots
Traditionally, espresso has been made from a blend of different coffees. To many, this is simply the way espresso is. Recently, we have seen the beginning of a sort of “sea change” in the coffee world. For various possible reasons, a small, but growing, segment of coffee professionals and aficionados have begun to experiment with espresso made from single origin beans. These experiments have been so successful that, in some cases, they have resulted in a re-evaluation of the assumed importance of blending for espresso.
Traditionally, espresso has been made from a blend of different coffees. To many, this is simply the way espresso is. Recently, we have seen the beginning of a sort of “sea change” in the coffee world. For various possible reasons, a small, but growing, segment of coffee professionals and aficionados have begun to experiment with espresso made from single origin beans. These experiments have been so successful that, in some cases, they have resulted in a re-evaluation of the assumed importance of blending for espresso.
The arguments for the value of blends for espresso have ranged from commercial in nature, to aesthetic to cultural.
There are a lot of roasters who feel that a consistent flavour profile, year in and year out, is critical not only for their sales, but for consumer acceptance of espresso. For them to achieve this consistent flavour profile, a blend is obviously the best option. In fact, in most cases they’ll need to specifically blend in a manner that minimizes the flavour contributions of any one bean in order to reduce the risk of either a change in that bean in a subsequent harvest or a supply problem with that bean. In many cases, this results in blends that have what could be described as a “generic” espresso flavour with, at best, a single accent note that is simple and can be achieved through the use of a wide range of beans from various sources.
There are also a lot of roasters who prefer the more round and polished flavour profile of a blended espresso. A blended espresso can be “tuned” for a very balanced flavour profile by counter-balancing the unique contributions of each bean. Blending in the manner can produce the above described “generic” espresso profile in many cases, though it can also produce unique and interesting espresso flavours in the hands of a great blender. Single origin espresso will almost always have a less “complete” profile than a blend, and will be more likely to have individual flavour notes that are either dominant or could be seen as objectionable to some palates.
Finally, there is a significant cultural tradition of espresso blending that cannot be discounted. For roasters who are committed to the tradition of Italian espresso, a non-blended espresso is as heretical as drinking a cappuccino after noon. This cultural resistance to change has been seen in other areas of the espresso industry in the past. You still hear many coffee “experts” claim that tamping is stupid and un-needed. The argument always goes “the Italians never tamp – they invented espresso – espresso in Italy is amazing;” end of story. This same argument is used to support not cleaning the espresso machine and the use of Robusta in espresso blends, among other controversial decisions. For many, drinking espresso is a statement of cultural and lifestyle identity, and change is thus undesirable.
There is no denying that all of the above arguments for blended espresso have merit. At the same time, they are all based upon subjective and often purely aesthetic and personal decisions and goals. None alone, and in fact not even all taken as a whole are a compelling argument against the use of single origin coffees as espresso.
Selling single origin espresso requires education – but this is true with any higher end culinary experience. Obviously, it’s easier to sell espresso that tastes like all other espresso, and which tastes exactly the same as the espresso that was sold to you the previous day. In this case, you’re actually not selling – you’re merely meeting the lowest common denominator of demand. In any higher-end coffee bar, the staff is more than capable of discussing, at length, the flavours and merits of any of the origin coffees being sold. Hand-selling bulk coffee in this manner is an accepted requirement of the job, in fact. There is little to no difference between this process and selling a single origin espresso.
Changing flavour profiles for an espresso blend is, in fact, a risky decision. People have expectations and become accustomed to a specific experience associated with a specific item. This, however, is not the case with single origin espresso. With proper hand selling, no customer is going to expect that a Guatemala Antigua Latte is going to taste like a Uganda Bugisu Latte. In fact, if handled correctly, an ever-changing “blackboard” style of espresso menu can be a differentiator rather than a risk – where customers look forward to the 2004 Uganda Bugisu, hoping to compare it to their memories of the previous harvest.
While it is true that there will single-origin espressos that are not palatable for each individual, this too can be managed. In a “blackboard” style espresso menu as mentioned above, one would always have a selection of espresso options. With proper management, this would allow a customer to choose from a comprehensive, but always new and fresh, selection of espressos. With proper hand selling, this would result in customers always being steered towards an espresso that met their tastes. By carrying no more than three different beans at any one time, one could argue that a more complete coverage of the espresso palate could be achieved that we see with current, “one espresso blend for all drinks,” model.
As part of a migration strategy, it may well be desirable to start by offering an espresso blend in addition to the changing single-origin menu. This does, however, present some risks. Staff may be unwilling to put the time and energy into selling the single-origin shots. This would also require either decreasing the number of single origin options on the menu, resulting in artificially lowering the odds of satisfying an individual customer, or would require purchasing even more grinders. Finally, this decreases the marketing and competitive differentiation opportunities of a move to single origin espresso.
Finally, there is no doubt that this move flies in the face of tradition. On the other hand, so did tamping. So did Latte Art and pure Arabica espresso. Life changes, practices change. Obviously, for lovers of all things traditional and/or Italian – single origin espresso is never going to be a big seller. But we are talking about a minority of the marketplace in this case.
So why should we experiment with single origin espresso? Why should we consider offering single origin espressos to customers? And why would we ever think of moving away from blended espresso to single origin espressos only?
When it comes right down to it, there are three good arguments for origin espresso. First – it refocuses attention on the bean. Second – it allows for a more complex and interesting espresso experience. Third – it can be a competitive differentiator.
The range of unique flavour profiles represented by coffee is astonishing. Many people have made the argument that the differences in flavour from coffee bean to coffee bean are more significant than we see in grapes/wine. By blending coffee, we blunt those differences and create a truncated flavour spectrum. This results in attention shifting from the bean and its unique flavour characteristics to the blend and in the end to the drink. The effects of this are profound and the resulting mis-education can be significant. The meaningless phrase “espresso roast” is an example of what can occur. Enthusiastic amateur coffee drinkers can talk at length about the differences between Indonesian and African coffees – but know next to nothing about the beans or their origins when it comes to espresso. By returning attention to the bean, we allow for a more complete and aesthetic appreciation of the coffee.
A single origin espresso is rarely, if ever, as “complete” as a blended espresso. But a blended espresso is rarely, if ever, as interesting as a single origin shot. In addition, by offering a range of different single origin espressos, and by accepting that variance in flavour over time is not only guaranteed by desirable, we create a long-term experience of espresso that is far more complex and engaging and vital. Consumers enjoy going to high-end restaurants and experiencing new and different presentations of a dish. Gourmets love discussing the relative merits of various preparations of a type of ingredient. Each experience presents a different “face” of the dish or ingredient, and ends up deepening the experience and appreciation of that dish or ingredient. The same can be true for espresso.
In the current espresso market, competing for the lowest common denominator is difficult if not impossible. The very large chains have a degree of leverage when it comes to branding and taste/experience identification which any independent business is going to find difficult to overcome (to say the least). At the same time, the market is getting ever more saturated and the niche available to the independent shop is getting ever more fragmented. In this scenario, any competitive differentiator – especially one that allows you to clearly identify yourself as doing something other than what the large brands are doing – is key. Offering single origin espresso has the benefits of creating a signature taste experience that is entirely different than what is available from the large brands. It clearly identifies a business as a gourmet coffee experience. It is difficult to pull off without skill and is thus defensible. Finally, it allows for freedom from price competition, allowing for acceptable higher prices and better margins.
The case for experimentation is even easier to make. Experimentation with single origin shots educates staff (roast staff as well as barista staff). It creates a culture of culinary experience and knowledge. It allows for more skilled and predictable blending.
Many older and more traditional coffee roasting professionals are depressed and/or angry about the rise of espresso. In some cases, they have a good case for their concerns. Too many baristi know little to nothing about the realities, flavours, market, experiences, history or processes behind the espresso blend that they stick in the hopper of their grinder. And far too many of those baristi are uninterested in learning about coffee. Experimentation with single origin espresso has the potential to change this.
In the current environment, a lot of people working in coffee businesses are doing so for lifestyle reasons. They like being able to play music they enjoy. They like not wearing a suit or pantyhose. They like having a flexible, bohemian life. They feel cool. This culture of dilettantes and lifestylists does not lend itself to the creation of great espresso. The creation of a culture of culinary espresso would address this. By educating employees in the flavours of coffee and by attracting employees who are interested in such a culture, we could see a dramatically increased commitment to the quality of taste.
Finally, even if a business sticks with blended espresso, by tasting the component beans as single origin shots – staff (baristi as well as roasters) would have an increased appreciation for the flavours of the blend and would be able to sell it better to customers and tune it better when blending and extracting.
When it comes right down to it – there are no good rational arguments for not at least playing around with single origin espresso. The benefits are real – and could be significant. Of course, this is a subversive statement – because the truth is that I’m convinced that any committed, professional gourmet coffee business that begins to experiment with single origin shots will discover the value of the experience and will discover a love for the resulting espresso. And thus… you too will join the revolution.
8.11.2004
single origin shots
so i'm gearing up for the "single origin showdown" (grin) at NASCORE next month.
it's going to be cool.
my candidate list looks something like... Guatemala Antigua Los Pastores (light vienna), Australian Mountain Top XF (either full city plus or light vienna), Honduran Marcala (full city plus), Uganda Sipi Falls (light vienna), Hawaii Dry Processed K'au (full city plus), Sumatra Gayo Mountain Dry Processed (light vienna).
i'm figuring i'll take two of these with me.
cupped the Panama Auction Lot "Leru" for the last couple of days. all i can say is WOW! it's probably the single most balanced coffee i've ever tasted. stunning.
it's going to be cool.
my candidate list looks something like... Guatemala Antigua Los Pastores (light vienna), Australian Mountain Top XF (either full city plus or light vienna), Honduran Marcala (full city plus), Uganda Sipi Falls (light vienna), Hawaii Dry Processed K'au (full city plus), Sumatra Gayo Mountain Dry Processed (light vienna).
i'm figuring i'll take two of these with me.
cupped the Panama Auction Lot "Leru" for the last couple of days. all i can say is WOW! it's probably the single most balanced coffee i've ever tasted. stunning.
8.09.2004
i had a really great experience the other day...
walked into the coffee bar (as a customer!) and watched Elaine (an employee i'd trained) pour a truly gorgeous heart in a capp.
and then i heard that she'd served a capp to a guidebook writer the previous day who had said it was the best espresso drink he'd ever had.
made me feel really, really good.
tasted a single origin shot of Brazil Cerrado today. intense, interesting, bold...
walked into the coffee bar (as a customer!) and watched Elaine (an employee i'd trained) pour a truly gorgeous heart in a capp.
and then i heard that she'd served a capp to a guidebook writer the previous day who had said it was the best espresso drink he'd ever had.
made me feel really, really good.
tasted a single origin shot of Brazil Cerrado today. intense, interesting, bold...
8.06.2004
BGA Member
I actually got my BGA card today!
I'm an official member of the Barista Guild of America!
Very cool.
I know it's geeky - but it feels good. To think that it wasn't that long ago that people first starting talking about some sort of guild for baristi on the SCAA site. And now it's real!
I'm an official member of the Barista Guild of America!
Very cool.
I know it's geeky - but it feels good. To think that it wasn't that long ago that people first starting talking about some sort of guild for baristi on the SCAA site. And now it's real!
8.05.2004
bad coffee - Tahoe
damn do i ever hate it when people serve me bad coffee. i'm not talking coffee that isn't exactly as i like it. i'm talking coffee that cannot be drunk, coffee so bad that 1/4 cup of cream and two tablespoons of sugar cannot cover the horrid, stale, dirty, unevenly extracted, bitter awfulness of it.
and after drinking coffee in Tahoe for two days, i'm thinking of naming it the Worst Coffee in the US. seriously. blech.
and after drinking coffee in Tahoe for two days, i'm thinking of naming it the Worst Coffee in the US. seriously. blech.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)