8.03.2025

Liturgies

I'm old school.

Or perhaps I'm just old.

In any event, my personal rituals around making coffee drinks are different than what you see on YouTube, and deviate materially from the current dogma. I have to admit I do enjoy the surprise of the younger generation when they see how I make drinks - but more than that I love the shock when they taste the coffee and realize it's actually quite good. I've had people ask me how I can produce drinks of this quality without all of the tools and procedures and rituals that everyone is told are required. I've had people literally ask me, "how can your espresso be so good when you do everything so wrong?"


This is an easy question for me to answer - but my answer is a hard answer for some to accept.


So let me illustrate.

The other day a friend of mine who is a passionate home barista asked me about my "puck prep routine" and my "puck prep station." My initial response was a bit snarky - which I feel bad about. I told him that my routine is, "grind, tamp, extract" and I shared a picture of my "puck prep station."



This was both unfair and incomplete.

I'm a different kind of barista. I was a line cook, sous chef, and chef for 14 years. I am a former commercial bar barista. I was trained by three of the best commercial barista trainers of all time. And I've had the kind of practice that nobody will ever get just pulling shots at home. At Stumptown I was pulling around 200 shots per bar shift and was doing 4 bar shifts per week. So take all the training, and then add all the practice -- well... you get amazing muscle memory combined with a deep understanding of the craft and a truly massive pattern library to leverage. 

What this has all resulted in is what I describe as a personally optimized set-up and workflow. And yes, it's very far from what current belief systems prescribe. It's also completely unsuited for anyone who doesn't have a similar background to mine -- and who isn't working with the same goals and constraints.


So first... I'll give you my constraints.

  • Every weekday I make one espresso and one cappuccino per day. They are made in the 30 minutes between when the alarm goes off and when Valerie and my first meetings occur. So I have a total of 30 minutes to wake up, get cleaned and dressed, get the coffee dialed in, make two drinks, clean up the bar, and get ready for work. 
    • So I need a highly efficient and fully optimized set-up and workflow that allows for back to back drinks, and both straight shots and short milk drinks.
  • On Saturday I have more like 45 minutes between when the alarm goes off and when Valerie heads out to go surfing. This allows me to relax a bit, but I still need to be efficient and optimized.
  • Three out of four Sundays are more relaxed, with closer to an hour to play with. These days often have me dialing in new coffees and experimenting with extractions as well as doing deeper cleaning of equipment and general maintenance.
  • One out of four Sundays is usually the Waiakalua Espresso Garage, where I'll make 25 to 35 drinks for neighbors and friends in about 90 minutes. These drinks tend to be mostly cappuccinos, with a few straight shots and maybe one macchiato thrown into the mix.
    • I'm the only person working the bar, of course, so I'm pulling shots and steaming milk and serving drinks and washing dishes and chatting with folks and bussing the garage.
    • So I need a highly efficient and fully optimized set-up and workflow that allows for back to back drinks, and both straight shots and short milk drinks, and which can maintain quality and consistency for 90 straight minutes of action.
My goals are simple. I want to serve the best espresso drinks on Kauai. I want to serve espresso drinks that are the best people have ever had, anywhere. I want to live up to the coffee I'm working with, and make the tradition and profession I come from look good. I want to make the people who trained me and the people who I both worked with and for proud.

What this has resulted in is a set-up which is in anathema to modern believers - and a workflow that is heretical.

Let's start with the abomination. I use a grinder with a doser. To be exact, I use an old, modified, Anfim Super Caimano Titanium. With a doser. That's right... it's not doserless. Yup... it "retains beans". The horror.

You know what else it does? It very quickly grinds and dispenses coffee in a consistent manner without imparting any static charge and without any clumping - and does so in a precise and repeatable manner. This means that the entire "puck prep" song and dance of "8 different tools, 4 techniques, and a prayer to the gods" is simply not required. As noted above... I dose, then I tamp. That's it. And yes, my extraction is great in the end. Oh... and as for the "bean retention" issue... The grinder I have retains very little. If the grinder sits idle for more than 20 min, I just push the "purge" button for 4s and clear it all. Done.

Now let's move on to the heresy. I don't weigh. Period. I don't weigh the coffee, I don't weigh the drink. I don't have a scale anywhere in the Espresso Garage. 

Instead I rely upon my senses but most of all I rely upon the pattern library I've built up through tens of thousands of espresso drinks. I rely upon my training, and I rely upon my palate. I watch flow rate; I track color changes; I manage time and volume; I see viscosity and I smell volatiles. And of course in the end... I taste the coffee. And then (based upon that immense pattern library) I adjust.

So why do I do this?
Why don't I just go modern, get a cool doserless grinder, adopt RDT, buy a few cheap tools, set up a scale, and do like the others do?

Because of my constraints - and my goals. Following today's liturgies would simply not work within my constraints - and would not allow me to reach my goals. Following today's rituals and dogma would not allow me to consistently bang out a good espresso shot in ~60s and a good cappuccino is ~90s.

The nice thing is that, once a month, I get validation. Folks at Espresso Garage include passionate home baristas - and professional baristas. And, while they are appalled at what they're witnessing, in the end they are always shocked and delighted by what's in the cup.

So why don't I adopt today's religious practices?
Because they are not necessary for me to reach my coffee goals -- and they do not fit within my constraints.

To close out, I thought I'd share a quick impromptu and un-staged video of me making a cappuccino. As you can see, total elapsed time is ~90s.


I'm not saying that you should adopt my set-up.
I'm not saying that my workflow is for everyone.
I am, however, saying you should question dogma. You should challenge belief systems. 
And most of all I am saying that you should reject fundamentalism and false universality.
What matters is what's in the cup.


7.13.2025

Slayer Single Group - Initial Impressions

 I’ve now worked with the new Slayer Single Group for enough time to have some initial thoughts to share.


First, just to set expectations and provide context.

  1. I’m going to ignore aesthetics and emotional attachment and appeal. I know that I have a strong bond with my old vintage La Marzocco GS; I knew in advance that any new machine was going to feel like a sacrifice aesthetically and emotionally; but most of all I know that pretty much everyone who reads this doesn’t care how a Slayer Single Group compares to a 1970 La Marzocco GS. Because few if any people will ever have a chance to pull shots on that machine much less own one. So the comparison is pointless to anyone but me.

  2. I’ve pulled shots with three different coffees (Maquina Ex Machina, Onyx Trilogy Public Label, Klatch WBC). I’ve used five different baskets (Caffewerks 3K and BaristaFlo, Slayer stock, La Marzocco Strada 21g, VST 18g). I’ve made drinks for myself and Valerie. I’ve served a bunch of people around 30 drinks in two hours. Drinks have been a mix of straight espresso, cappuccino, and a few macchiato. I’m using my trusty upgraded Anfim Super Caimano Titanium grinder. My workflow is: grind, dose, tamp, flush, preinfuse (~15s), extract (24s to 30s depending on coffee). Oh… Yeah, I do not weigh anything. 

  3. My frame of reference consists of the machines I’ve worked on extensively (i.e hundreds if not thousands of drinks served). The list includes Kees van der Westen Mistral and Speedster; La Marzocco Linea, PB, GS3, Linea Mini, and GS, and super modified Grimac Mia. 


Summary


The Slayer Single Group is an incredible accomplishment. You can work with it just as you’d work with any top commercial machine – without material changes to your workflow, with no compromises, and with no required work-arounds. And yet it is a very small footprint home machine which plugs into standard household power and is exceptionally easy to live with. I would feel comfortable serving a steady stream of visitors for hours – but also can just hop out of bed and be serving great drinks within 10 minutes. It’s very easy to use, and very easy to learn. It steams milk as well as if not better (and with less effort) than any machine I’ve ever worked on. It’s exceptionally easy to clean and maintain and is, in general, a very very easy machine to live with.


Sourcing and Install


I sourced the Slayer through Terry at Caffewerks. He’s a friend, but they’re also one of the best companies in the business and I’d probably have bought through them even if he were not a friend. The machine was air freighted directly from Slayer to Kauai.


The Slayer arrived in a very trick custom crate, designed to be broken down and stored for future use. Uncrating was easy, and setup was very simple. 


Unfortunately, one of the compression fittings had loosened on the plane and started leaking slowly once powered up. Side note: always open the case of a new machine when you first install it so that you can visually inspect all plumbing as it first heats up (a small inspection mirror helps). Terry along with Slayer customer and technical support were all very helpful and a quick re-seating and careful/gentle re-tightening of the compression fitting fixed the leak (and it has not leaked since).


Once all ready, it took about 40 minutes to become fully temp stable.


Adaptations and Adjustments


I have worked almost entirely on machines which have steam wands on the right side. Switching to steaming on the left was initially very strange, but adaptation was actually quite quick.


I have never worked on a machine that has this kind of pre-infusion. This was by far the biggest adaptation I’ve had to make. To be honest, initially I thought I’d simply not pre-infuse as I’ve not had many shots pulled with complicated pre-infusion that tasted consistently better than a standard flow-rate restricted La Marzocco. But then I taste tested, and there is a clear difference on this machine. I’m not going to categorically say “it’s better with pre-infusion” but I personally do have a slight preference. Because my workflow with milk drinks has always been to start brewing, then steam while brewing, I have found that I prefer using the pre-brew timer mode when serving a larger group.


Initially, I was not loving the texture of the shots - but reduced pump power to 79% (reducing brew pressure) and found a great sweet spot for my taste.


I’m old-school, and have pulled a lot of shots of espresso, so I extract by flow rate, color, time, and volume. I’ve not used a shot timer in decades other than when calibrating - and it’s kind of cool to have a visible built-in shot time right in front of me.


The cup tray is a lot smaller than what I’m used to, and that’s mostly been a good thing. I’ve had to curate my cupware down to what I truly use. The only drag is when I’m serving a lot of people I tend to go through warm cups quickly, and the hot water wand is a bit too wimpy to really use to pre-heat cups. I have a utility sink right next to the machine, however, so I’ve adapted by simply taking “table bussing” breaks and collecting and washing cups regularly.


Results in the Cup


The most noticeable difference in the cup with the Slayer (for me) is the consistency. Consistency of extraction and consistency of flavor is exceptional (on par with the best of the machines I’ve used).


Contrary to Slayer’s marketing, I actually don’t find that there is a “signature flavor” of the Slayer. Instead, in my experience the “signature flavor” of the Slayer is due to its basket - while the machine itself is neutral. E61 machines, to my taste, produce shots that are consistently muted and smooth and rounded and “lower midrange” dominant - and most La Marzocco machines produce shots that are transparent and exciting with both enhanced lower end and high end (but with a flat spot in the middle) - and the Mistral from Kees is expansive and loud with a very balanced profile. The Slayer, however, is a bit like a modern professional studio monitor speaker. It is, on its own, profoundly neutral with no corrections and no “softening of any edges” but can easily be used to mimic many other signature flavor profiles. This makes the Slayer a pretty amazing machine to use for tasting and evaluating coffees. 


Vacuum tube home audio enthusiasts talk a lot about “tube rolling.” This is the process of swapping out various tubes in your amplifier(s) to tune the overall system sound to your liking. With the Slayer, “basket rolling” has a more significant effect than it has on the other machines I’ve experienced and you can follow the same kind of process to tune the flavor profile of your espresso. Whereas, with other machines, you’re starting from a base “system profile” that has a signature and that is not neutral, and are “correcting” that profile to try and match your desires – with the Slayer Single Group, you’re starting from neutral and adding the “colouring” that fits your taste.


Using the stock Slayer basket yields shots that have the rounded, smooth profile of an E61 but with the enhanced low and high end of a La Marzocco and exceptional body and viscosity. The basket is very forgiving and easy to use, but the shots do lack clarity and transparency and definition of flavor. Using the BaristaFlo from Caffewerks resulted in shots that taste very similar to a classic stamped basket La Marzocco shot. The shots still have good body, but with enhanced clarity and distinction as compared to the stock basket. With the Strada basket, shots taste like what I would expect from a Mistral but with a smoother, less “heavy metal” profile and more integrated flavor, but with a weird combination of slight muddiness and a less creamy mouthfeel. Switching to the Caffewerks 3K basket yields shots which are similar in profile to an LM PB but with exceptional transparency and a very smooth profile and a bit of a roll-off on the low end along with the slight loss of viscosity I associate with the PB. I did not have good results from the VST basket.


In the end, I’ve been switching between three baskets. With nice, balanced and well-developed coffees without any off notes I find the 3K basket gives me what I want. If the coffee is still nice and balanced, but is under-developed, I find the stock Slayer basket meets my needs. For coffees that are unbalanced or have any off flavors, the BaristaFlo basket seems optimal.


Life with the Slayer


And now we get to the good stuff…


This is where the Slayer truly shines. This machine is just so easy. It’s easy to use. It’s easy to work with. It’s easy to work on. It’s easy to adjust and it’s easy to clean and it’s easy to maintain. 


It’s just an easy machine to live with.

And that’s amazing.


I absolutely love how simple it is to clean the Slayer. Between the auto-cleaning cycle and all the stainless steel and the lack of brass and the overall smart design - the usual drudgery of keeping your espresso machine clean is massively reduced.


I love how simple it is to make drinks with the Slayer. The combination of the timer and the shot mirror makes sense-based extraction easy. The steam wand is kind of magical. No other machine I’ve used has been so easy to produce great milk texture with. The layout is completely intuitive and barista-focused.


For all of its aggressive body design, the Slayer really is a no fuss espresso machine.


As of right now, there is only one issue I have with the Slayer Single Group. And it’s a known and not easy-to-solve problem. For some people (and I am one of them) the touchscreen isn’t super responsive. My skin is dry and has a lot of callus and scar tissue so this is not a huge surprise and for the most part is easy to manage. The only time this becomes a real problem for me is when trying to reduce brew temp. For some reason, the down arrow is by far the least responsive to my touch and it often takes me asking Valerie to come and use her thumb instead.


Should You Buy a Slayer


I’ve not mentioned one key thing about a Slayer Single Group. It’s very expensive. It is, in fact, so expensive that it is in the same price range as many commercial single group machines as well as a ton of exceptional “semi-commercial” home machines.

So if you can afford to buy a Slayer, you’re very fortunate and you’re very likely to end up with a great machine.


I’m not going to debate the whole “is it worth the money” thing. That’s impossible.


Instead I’m going to answer the question, “if you’re one of the fortunate few who are well off enough to be able to afford a Slayer Single Group, what would make you buy it over the other options?”


  1. If you make espresso drinks at home every day - but also entertain others and make a larger number of espresso drinks in a short amount of time every once in a while - then you should at least seriously consider the Slayer.

  2. If you’re not a mechanical engineer, aren’t a gear head, and find drinking good coffee more enjoyable than modifying your equipment - then you should at least consider the Slayer.

  3. If you are doing a lot of milk drinks back to back at least some of the time, but care deeply about the quality of your espresso - then you should at least consider the Slayer.

  4. If you don’t want to stress about finding replacement parts and want something easy to service - then you should at least consider the Slayer.

  5. If you care less about the drama and the show than the result in the cup - then you should at least consider the Slayer.

  6. If you want a machine that is plumbed in, you are going to use commercial water treatment, are creating your own espresso bar, and you want something where working on it feels more like working the bar than making coffee at home - then you should at least consider the Slayer.

  7. And if all of the above are true - I would suggest that the Slayer Single Group is probably the machine for you.


If you’ve read this far, and are curious and considering buying a Slayer Single Group, and just happen to be planning a trip to Kauai – let me know. 


7.02.2025

Goodbye and Hello

 I have never owned anything that I care about as much as my vintage La Marzocco GS.


And frankly, that's kind of underselling how I feel about the machine. It's a rare piece of coffee history -- but it's also an incredibly important part of my personal story.


I loved my time working in coffee. I loved the people I worked with. I loved (and love) coffee. But sadly, I don't have a ton of connection to that part of my life anymore. When I left Stumptown there were very few co-workers who remained friends with me. And when I left the coffee business, there were very few business colleagues and acquaintances who remained friends. Over time, many of those who remained have drifted away. But a few, a small few, stayed with me. One of them is a guy named Terry Ziniewicz. Terry and I met while I was at Stumptown, and became close after I'd left. Over time I became tight with not just Terry, but also his amazing partner Kelly and his entire family. When Terry sold his company Espresso Parts NW, he gifted me the espresso machine that had been his long-time booth machine. The GS.


Terry knew that I loved the La Marzocco GS and dreamed of one day owning one. So he made my dream come true. And that's how the vintage GS became my most treasured possession. It was my connection to Terry and Kelly. It was my connection to coffee (and my time in coffee). And it was an incredibly kind, thoughtful, and meaningful gift.


Of course, none of this would matter if the thing produced Nespresso caliber espresso. But that machine? That machine was not only special, and meaningful, and historical, and (frankly) sexy AF.... In the hands of a skilled barista it also produced amazing espresso.


And for roughly two decades, I used it most every day to make drinks for myself and for Valerie. I used it to make drinks for friends. I used it. Pretty much daily.


But using a 1970s vintage Italian commercial espresso machine as your daily source of coffee is a bit like using a 1970s vintage Italian sports car as your daily driver. The joke about actually driving vintage Italian sports cars is that you need a mechanic small enough to fit into the trunk (with all their tools). And that joke became some painful foreshadowing for me over time. 


At first, the issues were small. The brew button's actuator broke and it turned out that the company that made the part went out of business back in the 1980s or something. And these small issues were always things I could work around. Sure, I couldn't brew and steam at the same time as I had to manually hold down the brew button to brew. Other small things failed like the steam wand gasket, but we figured shit out.


But then the leaks started.


For context, early La Marzocco GSs are notorious for the leaks. They did not have groups that were welded onto the boiler. Instead, the groups were bolted on using a janky "cage" set up and a big old gasket. Needless to say, these gaskets would start to leak as they aged. And replacing the gasket was a huge challenge due to the way the cage was used to bold the group on. So every once in a while, the machine would be out of service for a while for repair (often by Terry of course). This was non-optimal, but was something I could manage.


But then the leaks got worse.


You see, as that boiler and that group and those gaskets heat cycled, things stop fitting. Metal deformed. Things stopped aligning and most of all, things stopped sealing. Last year, Terry flew over to Kauai and brought parts and tools and crazy ideas for how to fix the leaks. And it worked.


For a little while.


But then there was a small leak - and this time it shorted out a switch. So the machine had to be shut down, a part sourced and replaced, and then (with fingers crossed) the machine was fired up while we all watched to see if there would be leaking. And there was no leaking!


At first.


But then the leaking started again, and soon after that, there was another short. But this time it was the controller for the machine. And most of all, it had become clear that there was no stopping the leaks anymore. Perhaps the boiler is too warped now. Perhaps the group attachment is deformed. Or maybe the machine is just simply old and tired.


Regardless, I realized it was time to let it go. It was time to say goodbye.


The only thing that makes this moment okay for me is that the GS is heading back to Terry. I'd left the machine to his son in my will anyway - and it was time for it to return. I hope that Terry is able to do something amazing with it. He's talking about interesting resto-mod ideas, and he's the kind of mad scientist who probably will be able to pull something amazing off. And that will be great. It will be amazing to see that machine functional again.


It breaks my heart to say goodbye. But it's time.


And it definitely makes it easier to say farewell when I've just taken delivery of a brand new Slayer Single Group. Sure... it's not a piece of coffee history. Yeah... it doesn't have the same personal meaning. And OK... it's nowhere near as sexy. But it's a very, very nice espresso machine. And it's brand new. And it's under warranty. All the parts are currently being made (and are available). It runs on standard household power. And everything works.


I will never stop missing the GS. But I'm one week into owning the Slayer, and it's really good. The shots are good. Steaming milk is 1,000,000 times easier than on the GS. Most of all... it's just low stress.


Goodbye GS. I've loved you - and I always will love you.


Hello Slayer. You are the first espresso machine I've ever actually purchased - and I think you're going to be great.










12.03.2024

Living with a vintage espresso machine

 

"It's just like owning a vintage Ferrari."


I love my espresso machine. It's gorgeous. It's truly special. And it produces incredible espresso.


But the machine has been out-of-duty since June due to a gasket failure. I briefly thought that I could take on the repairs myself, but when I told Terry Z from Caffewerks that it looked like I was going to need to bend the sheet metal to do the work, he told me to stop right there. 


In retrospect, he was right and having to live without espresso for a half year was, in fact, the correct choice. 


This is the reality of living with a vintage espresso machine. Either you are one of the rare number of people in the world who are mechanical engineers with a deep background in vintage Italian espresso machines and a garage full of no-longer-in-production parts -- or you know one of those people and they are willing to help you fix your machine every time a part fails.


The good news is that it only took Terry a day and a half to replace the damaged cage and put the correct gasket in place. The good news is that Terry is a genius and a good friend. The good news is that now I can make and drink great espresso again. The good news is that the Waiakalua Espresso Garage is back in business!


Huge mahalos to Terry. And to those considering purchasing or running a vintage espresso machine, caveat emptor. 

10.05.2023

Some nice espresso options from Maquina

Well... that was quick. I asked for some suggestions on coffees to try, and specified what I was looking for in espresso.


Despite a bit of a faltering start - I quickly got a few nice ones from Maquina Coffee Roasters, and thought I'd share my thoughts on them.


First... their Parts & Labor blend.


This is a unique and interesting espresso, and one that should please a wide range of coffee drinkers.


A relatively light roast blend that combines high grown Latin coffees with a sweet and fruity Ethiopian coffee, Parts & Labor gives you a range of potential extraction sweet spots which should satisfy many palates.


In the cup, the espresso is dominated by layers of sweetness. Depending on the sweet spot chosen these can range from honey and berry sweetness to cocoa and red fruit sweetness to a combination of all the above.


With my set-up I found two optimal sweet spots - both at a brew temp of 202.3f.


The first sweet spot yielded a "modern" style shot - representing a sort of highly concentrated version of a brewed version of the coffee. With a neutral dose, fine grind, and more full extraction, the result was a shot dominated by berry and jam flavors and soaring floral notes. A mild sweet cocoa base and hints of raw honey brought it all together. Mouthfeel was thin, and the flavor was very clean - leaving the palate quickly. Best as a straight shot or as a short americano and largely lost in milk drinks.


The second sweet spot yielded a more "traditional" style shot - where the espresso isn't just a method of brewing but rather a style of beverage as well. With a larger dose, coarser grind, and more restricted shot, the result was an extraordinarily concentrated shot with deep layers of sweetness ranging from red fruit to berry compote to fruit liqueur and sweet cocoa - all wrapped in layers of honey. The chocolate became more present, giving the shot a muscular base and balance. Mouthfeel was coating and creamy - and as a result the shot was optimal consumed in a single sip (and then savored for 20-30 minutes). Great as a straight shot or a cappuccino, but best in a macchiato.


I can recommend this one highly to anyone who is comfortable working with lighter roasted espresso.


And saving the best for, well, second... the Brazil Fazenda Baioka.

In general, when I think "single origin medium roast espresso from Brazil" I think of a very specific flavor profile. What Duane Sorenson once called "Reese's Peanut Butter Cups." When good, these coffees are usually dominated by light milk chocolate, hints of cocoa, and tons and tons of almond butter and peanut butter and cashew butter. There are, in many ways, the prototypical "comfort food espresso."


This is not that single origin espresso from Brazil.


In the cup, this espresso is all about the cherry flavors - with strong cherry liqueur notes, some nice chocolate covered dark cherry, and Rainier cherry acidity on top - all riding on a solid base of muscular chocolate syrup. This is a very nice single origin espresso and is something I could drink regularly.


With my set-up there was one clear optimal sweet spot. This was at 199.7f brew temp, a neutral dose, and a more full extraction. The one warning here is that brew temps over 200f result in strongly bitter shots with noticeable astringency. So you need to be able to control your brew temp well.


Best as a straight shot but also good in a short milk drink. Definitely recommended for anyone looking for a medium roast, super tasty espresso.

9.16.2023

My Search for Espresso

Well... so far my search for a new "House Espresso" has had mixed results.


I'll start with the good... I've tried coffees from three roasters that were good to excellent coffees, and which produced interesting to good espresso. None really matched my needs for a go-to espresso, but they were all worth drinking, and a few are decent stop-gap options for me long term. 


Now the bad... I've had a lot of bad espresso, and unfortunately a lot of mediocre to not good coffee - and most of these coffees have been premium priced. I've been trying all these coffees as espresso, but I've also been cupping them. Other than the coffees from the three roasters I mention below, none of the coffees I've cupped would have graded out over 84 points. That would be fine - if they were priced accordingly. But I've been selecting "special" coffees, and they've been priced based on their specialness. 


On the good side - I've had a couple really nice coffees from Maquina Coffee.  Both their Parts & Labor blend and their Brazil Fazenda Baioka were very nice coffees and resulted in good to very good espresso. The coffees from Puff Coffee consistently performed very well on the cupping table, and their Spirit Lifter was workable as espresso. And I had two coffees from my old employer Stumptown Coffee Roasters that were very nice indeed. Both the Guatemala Finca El Injerto Bourbon and the Honduras El Puente Natural were standouts on the cupping table and produced interesting espresso. 


Back to the bad - I tried coffees from roasters ranging from some of America's hottest and trendiest micro-roasters to rejuvenated larger established roasters to cutting edge roasters to what many call the best roaster in Hawai'i. As noted above - none of these coffees would score over 84 points on the table. Most were in the 82-83 point range. In addition, none had any relationship to their tasting notes. As an example, there was one coffee that was described with flavor notes including cocoa, dry spice, and butterscotch. On the table the cup was dominated by fish oil and burnt toast notes. Another was described as having layered citrus and sweet berry notes, but in the cup was dominated by lemongrass, hay, and lime extract. Neither was drinkable as espresso. Frustratingly, all of these coffees had some degree of roast defect. From par-baked coffees to tipped ones; from coffees that lacked any expansion to ones with visible charred spots; from beans covered in chaff to ones still green in the center - it feels like a lot of folks out there are simply failing at roasting coffee. And all of these coffees were moderately to significantly more expensive that the Puff or Maquina coffees. All were marketed as being very special and unique. Instead, all were marginally better than commodity green that was noticeably mis-roasted. 


I will continue the quest.

I hope to find my dream espresso.

Wish me luck.

9.05.2023

Looking for a 'house espresso'

I love experimenting with new coffees - but I also appreciate having a standard, go-to espresso for everyday use. Something I've got really dialed in so that on those 4:45am mornings I don't have to fuck about and can just pull a shot and go to work.


I've had a number of standard 'house espresso" options over the years - but it's time for something new. And I've been trying to find the right coffee - but have been failing.


So I'd love your suggestions.


Now... of course... I have some requirements and I'm more than a little bit picky. So let me first lay out the requirements and criteria and if any of you have ideas for a coffee that might be a good fit, please let me know. Please keep in mind that these are requirements. None are optional.


Requirements

  1. It must produce good tasting espresso. I know, this seems obvious but a huge percentage of coffees I've had in the last 10 years produce at best "interesting" tasting espresso. 
  2. The espresso must be balanced. And this is where most "interesting" espresso falls down for me. I want an espresso that has a balanced profile - where the acidity is balanced with sweetness and (yes) bitterness. 
  3. It must have great mouthfeel. I don't want an espresso that has the mouthfeel of concentrated brewed coffee. It should be slightly viscous. It should be coating. It should linger in the mouth for a half hour.
  4. It must give one the experience of espresso. This sums up the prior three points. I am not at all interested in an espresso that is merely a very concentrated brewed coffee in flavor, texture, or experience. I am looking for espresso (the drink) in its classic form.
  5. It must be well roasted. I'm less concerned about roast degree (although, given some of the points above, a medium roast is probably the most likely fit). But it cannot be poorly roasted. The beans must be fully developed. They cannot be scorched or tipped. No roast defects... please. They make me sad.
  6. It must be a quality green or a blend of quality green coffee. Nothing makes me more depressed that tasting defect in my espresso. I'm tired of baggy, flat, coffee that tastes of damp cardboard. I cannot take any more funky ferment that combines over-ripe blueberry and baby diaper. I don't want commodity coffee that's being "disposed of" in your blend.
  7. It must be consistent. I'm perfectly happy tweaking the brew temp 0.3f batch to batch. I'm perfectly happy tweaking dose a few percentage points. But if each batch is like a brand new voyage of discovery, then it's not what I'm looking for. I need the sort of thing a former barista like myself would find easy to work with.
  8. It must work well as straight espresso, and in short milk drinks. I make an espresso and a cappuccino every morning. The coffee must work for both. I don't need it to work for a latte, or an americano. But it has to work for an espresso, a cappuccino, and ideally a macchiato as well.

And... ideally, it won't cost an absurd amount of money to have it shipped to Hawai'i. Big shout out to the roasters who ship flat-rate USPS Priority Mail. 


If you read this and think, "Oh I have the espresso for you!" please drop me a comment or send me an email or text message with your suggestion. I would really appreciate it!